Top Advanced Financial Reporting Sample

QUESTION 1

The first case is about Bristol Myers Squibb Co. (BMS) which is a multi-national pharmaceutical company. In 2004, Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) levied a penalty of USD 150 million against BMS as the company was involved in extreme earnings management technique like “stuff the channel” and “cookie jar”. According to the SEC, the company has adopted fraudulent ways for inflating its sales and earnings in order to meet the forecast made by the analyst. The first section will analyze why companies go for such kind of accounting activities such as “stuffing the channel” and “cookie jar” and will evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques for both short term and long term point of view.

Reasons behind using Extreme Earnings Management Techniques

Before getting into earnings management, let’s first be clear about the term earnings. Earnings are the profit made by the company during the financial year. It is only the earnings of the company which makes the stock attractive or unattractive in the eyes of investors. Poor earnings of the firm may result in a fall in share price of the company. Thus, the earnings of the company play a very important role in deciding the share price of the firm. In order to make the stock attractive, companies and managers adopt the technique called earnings management (Cohen and Eli, 2009). The managers use earning management techniques to manipulate the actual earnings of the company so as to match them with the forecasted figures of the company or analysts. The main aim of the managers behind adopting the earnings management techniques is to smooth the income of the company. That is, it does not matter whether the company is having good or bad earnings for years; by using these technique companies’ tries to manipulate the sales and earnings figure so as to maintain it near about a particular level and eliminating the fluctuations. The organizations achieve this by either adding or deducting the cash in their reserve accounts. This is known as “cookie jar” (Caylor, 2010). Below are the main reasons stating the purpose for which the manager uses extreme earnings management techniques:

1. For bonus purposes
2. To maintain the reputation of the firm
3. To meet the expectations of the investors
4. For initial public offerings
5. Other contracting motivations

• For Bonus Purpose: The most important reason for the manager to use earnings management is to increase their bonus level. According to “The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions” by Healy, the bonus figure of the managers depends on the reported net income of the company which reflects their performance. Therefore, managers use some extreme earnings management techniques to maximize their bonus (Latson, Dechow and Sloan, 2010).
• To maintain the reputation of the firm: Another reason why managers use these extreme earnings methods is to maintain the reputation of their company. If the company is actually able to maintain its sales and profile levels and is actually reporting consistent earnings in every period, then it does not need to adopt these techniques as the actual figures are enough to lure investors towards it. But if the company is facing a lot of fluctuations in the sales, earnings and profit levels every year, in that case, investors may consider the company as risky investment and it will affect the reputation of the firm. In such circumstances, the company adopts these earnings management techniques to manipulate its sales, earnings and profit figures. And it will indirectly help the company in maintaining its reputation (Steenburg and Chapman, 2008).
• Other contracting motivations: The earnings management techniques are used to lower down the chances of covenant violation in the debt contracts. Sweeny, DeFond and Jiambalvo, in their study found out that most of the companies use new accounting standards when the net earnings of the company is increased by the rules. Moreover, they also concluded that companies adopt discretionary accruals to show higher earnings in their financial reports.
• For initial public offerings (IPOs): Firms which are going for Initial Public Offering, their share price is not established in the market. So in order to get higher prices for the company’s share, managers use these earnings management techniques so as to report higher earnings of the company. As lower reported earnings of the company will reflect its poor performance and will result lower collection by the company through IPO (Stubben, 2009).

QUESTION 2

Chances of Impairment Loss

Impairment of the asset can be defined as a rapid fall in the fair price of the asset due to some damage occurred to it or it has become obsolescent. If it happens to fixed assets, the company has to show the decreased value machine in the balance sheet and has to report loss in the profit and loss account. Or in other terms, it can be said that an impairment loss on any assets occurs when the reported amount of the asset exceed its fair amount which in reality is not possible for the company to recover. The impairment loss can be calculated by subtracting the fair value of the asset by the asset’s carrying amount. The impairment loss reduces the carrying amount of the assets so it is advisable to charge depreciation on the assets to adjust the carrying amount (McNichols, 2002). Below are the certain circumstances which results in impairment of assets:

• Decrease in fair value of the asset: The circumstance can be a sudden decrease in fair value of the asset. It can be due to various reasons. Firstly, there may be possible some damage is occurring to the machine, secondly, it has become obsolescent, and finally, there may be case some new technology has been has been introduced in the market and due to which the price of the current technology has gone down.
• The way in which the asset has been used: It also results in impairment loss. If the assets are frequently used by the company, its fair value decreases quickly as compared when it is used rarely (Ingram, Lee and Howard, 1999).
• Significant change in the business or regulatory environment: Change in business and regulatory environment also affects the price of an asset. Suppose a company is using some asset and regulation is passed by the government or the local authority stating the ban on such asset. In that case the fair value of the machine will decrease (Johnson and Mitton, 2003).

Apart from the above stated circumstances, other possibilities which will result in impairment loss are:

1. Operating loss of the current period
2. If the cost of manufacturing the assets exceeds the budgeted cost
3. Operating activities result in a negative flow of cash
4. If the market price of the asset changes
5. If the asset is disposed of much before its estimated life (Gereish, 2003).

Effects of impairment review on firm’s financial position and performance

When Vodafone conducted its impairment review, it was found there it is suffering due to volatility in its earnings. In 2005-06 it was found out that the company has written off £23.5 billion in its goodwill due to European operations. Because of the impairment loss the company suffered a loss of £21.8 billion in 2005-06, as compared to a profit of £6.5 billion made by the company in 2004-05.
Same was the case with the PSA Peugeot Citroen. When the company conducted the impairment review, it was found that there is a significant difference between the equity value reported by the company in the balance sheet and the economic value of the future discounted cash flow of its equity. The difference gave rise to the depreciation of around €3,888 million. Although this depreciation amount did not impact the operational cash flow of the company but it substantially reduced the net income of the company in 2012 (Impairment of Assets, n.d).

CONCLUSION

After working on the above report it can be concluded that it is very important the companies to follow GAAP and international accounting principle in order to standardize its financial statements. Further, the companies must try to avoid the fraudulent practices for reaping short term benefits.

REFERENCES

• Abbott, L.J., and Parker, S. 2000. The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance. (26), pp. 55-67.
• Altamuro, J., Beatty, A. and Weber, J. 2005. The effects of accelerated revenue recognition on earnings management and earnings informativeness: Evidence from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101. The Accounting Review. 80 (2). pp. 373-401.
• Caylor, M. 2010. Strategic revenue recognition to achieve earnings benchmarks. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 29 (1), pp. 82-95.
• Cohen, D and B. Eli, 2009. The Numbers Game in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Eras, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. 24 (4), pp. 505-534.
• Daouk, H., Bhattacharya, U. and Welker, M. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review. 78 (3), pp. 641-678.
• Friedrich, B. 2004. International Accounting Standard 36 (IAS 36), Impairment of Assets. [Pdf]. Available through: Website: <http://www.cga-pdnet.org/Non_VerifiableProducts/ArticlePublication/IFRS_E/IAS_36.pdf>. [Accessed on 27th April, 2013].
• Gereish, L.H. 2003. Organizational culture and fraudulent financial reporting. The CPA Journal. 73(3), pp. 28-32.

UPTO50%

Avail The Benefit Today!

To View this & another 50000+ free

Enter Email

Submit